THE NEXTAGE LIGHT MISSION

 DIVINE INSPIRED DIRECTIONS RECEIVED THROUGH CELESTIAL INTELLIGENT CREATION (CIC) - CONNECTIONS

IF BEHIND A DOOR IS FOUND GOLD AND ALL YOU NEED DO TO SECURE IT IS TURN THE KEY AND THE VERY SAME KEY IS THEN FIRMLY PLACED IN YOUR HANDS.. WHAT WOULD YOU DO?

BY GOING TO THE WEB PAGE INDICATED BELOW.. IS THAT VERY SAME KEY TO THAT SAME DOOR. THERE YOU CAN CLAIM THE GREATEST SECRET OF ALL AND WORTH FAR MORE THAN CAN EVER PURCHASED ON EARTH!

http://www.lulu.com/Nextagemission

*****************************

ARE WE NEARING A CRITICAL PHASE/CROSSROADS FOR HUMANITY?

ARE CHANGING EARTH PATTERNS TRYING TO TELL US SOMETHING?

ARE SOME LANDS AND PEOPLES - VIRTUALLY ABANDONED IN FAVOUR OF A MINORITY?

IS THERE FAR MORE BEHIND THE RHODESIAN/ZIMBABWE DEBACLE?

DO CERTAIN LANDS, CONTAIN GREATER UNIVERSAL DIVINE IMPRINTS, MEANINGS TO A CELESTIAL LINEAGE RNA/DNA?

For more answers - Buy Now popular writings located at:

http://www.lulu.com/Nextagemission

(Good - from the heart - honest reading and well to Futures)

(Much of the below is as that recorded at the above link)

EXPERIENCES WHEN SO RECOGNISED AS VITAL LESSONS, BUT AS DELIVERED THROUGH DIVINE-LIGHT, MIGHT WELL HELP OTHERS UNDERSTAND AND ALSO SECURE MEANINGS/PURPOSES ALL THE WAY BACK TO ORIGINAL CELESTIAL LIFE PATHWAYS.

LEARN THROUGH THE ABOVE WRITINGS, EVENTS AND OUTCOMES AS CLEAR CUT EXAMPLES AND LESSONS TO BE LEARNED AND DECODED TO A TOTAL MEANING AND PURPOSE

WHY CERTAIN EVENTS TRANSPIRE IN PARTS OF THE WORLD AT CERTAIN TIME JUNCTURES FOR HUMANITY

SOME HUMAN CREATIONS, RETAIN HIGHER STRANDS OF ORIGINAL RNA/DNA THAN OTHERS

WHY WE MEET CERTAIN PEOPLE IN CERTAIN PLACES, UNDER GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES TO EXPERIENCE CERTAIN VITAL LESSONS AT SPECIFIC TIME LINES DELIVERING SPECIFIC DESIGNED END MEANINGS/PURPOSES

EVEN WHY RETURNING TO CERTAIN LOCATIONS DURING NEW LIFE PERIODS ARE SPECIFIC TESTS AND LESSONS TO BE COMPLETED AS IMMORTAL CREATIONS THROUGH A SPECIFIC TIME-VORTEX IN ORDER TO PROGRESS ON-WARDS

ALSO, SEE HAVE FAITH/TWIN-FLAMES PAGE: EXPLANATIONS OF INCARNATIONS AT SPECIFIC DESIGNED ELECTROMAGNETIC VORTEX FUSIONS ARE BEING DEEPLY ETCHED TO EARTH'S DIVINE UNIVERSAL TIME-LINE/TEMPLATE

THE SINGLE MOST VALUABLE EARTH ASSET THROUGH LIGHT-CREATION, REMAINS THE HUMAN CELESTIAL INFUSED SOUL. IT IS A PRIME ASSET, EVEN FOUGHT OVER DOWN THE CENTURIES OR DISRUPTED AS SET WITHIN SPECIFIC CALIBRATED GEOGRAPHIC UNIVERSAL EARTH INFUSED LOCATIONS AS LINKED ALL THE WAY BACK TO UNIVERSAL DIVINTY.

DIVINE INFUSED MOTIVATION THROUGH EXPERIENCES TO ARRIVING AT A SPECIFIC TIME-VORTEX/LINE

BIRTH PLACE - RHODESIA - AFRICA

Control over a majority, yet through more subtle means by an unseen minority, has been unfolding before our eyes ever since the ending of a human second world-war in the year 1945. See the book titled 'MADNESS UNDER THE SUN' for shifts in percentages of total control from 1945 to 2006. Robert, along with a number born and raised to the then lands of Rhodesia (Now Zimbabwe), would yet feel fuller, lasting impacts of certain calculated actions. Designed measures, to then also deeply afflict/impact the more vulnerable majority left behind in certain lands. A majority of Rhodesian whites, would end up scattered around the globe, many as that termed 'Modern Day Nomads.' Yet, those who had so actively supported and fought a vicious civil-war supposedly designed by freedom fighters to entrench and enhance the situation in Rhodesia: actually delivered virtual imprisonment heavily down on their very own people. Measures and principles as that sold to deliver true, lasting so called UHURU (INDEPENDENCE), HAS IN EFFECT FAILED A MORE WILLING, YET ALSO INDUCED OR COHERCED MAJORITY OF THEPERIODS!

FAIR QUESTION: DID RHODESIA, YET WHEN RELATING IN EFFECT TO DAY TO DAY ACCOUNTABILTY AND ACTIVITY: THEN IN ALL REALITY, ACTUALLY SECURE INDEPENDENT TITLE AS THAT DULY TERMED: RECOGNISED AND SO ALSO ENDORSED AS IMPLIED LEGAL INDEPENDENT JURISDICTION/STATUS? SECURE AND SO ALSO GAIN INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN STATUS AS CONSTITUTING A DE FACTO AUTHORITY OVER LANDS! INDEED, HAD IT (RHODESIA), SECURED AS DULY CONSTITUTED: HAVING BEEN RULED ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS BY BRITAIN, TO THEN ALSO FORM ACTUAL PART AND PARCEL OF A THEN WIDER BRITISH EMPIRE?

QUESTION OF ON-GOING LEGALITY – RHODESIA: EXCERPT FROM THE POPULAR BOOK

'WHITE CHIEF OF AFRICA'

LOCATED AT

http://www.lulu.com/Nextagemission

written and compiled by Robert Winston-Burnett

(A born and raised - Rhodesian)

'RHODESIAN OF AFRICA

THE SPIRIT NEVER DIES

IMPORTANCE OF MY FLAG

 "If you take my flag, you take everything. I should be a fool to give up my flag and my traditions, and I should be a knave because I should be Despised by my own countrymen and distrusted by yours."

Remarks made by Cecil John Rhodes (Founder of THE RHODESIA'S) during an interview by the German editor of the "Free State Express" quoted in Le Super's TITLED ‘Cecil Rhodes’ 

DISTINCTIVE RHODESIAN FLAG

with Great Zimbabwe Bird

RISING LANDS OF RHODESIA

FORWARD IN UNITY

These rising lands and stretching for mile upon barren mile, soon will produce for all to see. Rising lands from out of nothing and carved out of the blood, sweat, tears at the toil of aching and breaking backs. Many succumb under its blazing glare to where some men even fear to tread, even dare. Here are lands rising from which men and women across the seas turned into ‘God’s own Lands.’ Give rise then to these lands of Rhodesia fair. 

CHORUS

Rising lands, rising lands bless those who but will dare.
Oh rising lands, rising lands lift our souls
towards your glorious sunshine.
There to bless all who live in her and so
give rise to lands of Rhodesia set so fair.

Rise O voices of Rhodesia. God may we thy bounty share. 

Give us strength to face all danger and, Where challenge is,

 to dare.  Guide us, Lord, to wise decision, ever of thy 

grace aware. Oh, let our hearts beat bravely always,  

for this land within thy care.  

Rise, O voices of Rhodesia, bringing her your proud acclaim, 

Grandly echoing through the mountains, rolling over 

far-flung plain. Roaring in the mighty rivers, joining 

in one grand Refrain. Ascending to the 

sunlit heavens, telling of her 

honored name.

BRUTISH BETRAYAL

 RHODESIA

QUESTION OF ON-GOING LEGAL JURISDICTION

“Oh what a tangled web we weave, when at first we practice to deceive.”

All due references extended to actual British sovereignty over then lands The Rhodesia's, now (Zimbabwe and Zambia), might well remain in question! But more specifically in relation to the South, yet might also include the North. Indeed, appears as if certain jurisdictions through contradictions. Might well still be in contention/question after certain, yet also highly relevant protestations by certain officials. That the then two Rhodesia's: had and so did more openly remain advertised as having indeed attained legal day to day jurisdiction per say and all that this duly implies as due operatives of having remained THE LEGAL ENTITY.

A NUMBER DOWN THE YEARS AND SO FORMING VARIOUS OPINIONS OF A WIDER WORLD, HAVE POSTED ARGUMENTS WITH DUE REFLECTIONS TO CURRENT DAY OUTCOMES (ZIMBABWE 2006). THESE RELATE DIRECTLY AS CONSTITUED THROUGH DESIGN OVER LEGALITIES PERTAINING TO LANDS KNOWN AND SO RECORDED AND DULY RECOGNISED AS THE THEN 'RHODESIA'S.'

Actual reasons extended through insisting and thereby handing over Rhodesia, might well have been constituted by other outside and so unseen leverages/influences. Those employed to then effect internationally lands of RHODESIA as indeed having been constituted as an illegal regime from the outset. The calculations and so also reasoning's extended to arrive at such conclusion, might well also contain far more to the lands as indeed remaining a vital Geographic Universal location. So secured in turn by other unseen entities direct relation to that known as priorities to effect unseen influences/forces towards certain designed - even 'Calibrated Universal Aligned Outcomes.

The British Broadcasting Corporations (BBC) program titled ‘Rhodes,’ most certainly brought into direct question, even for more open debate. British intrinsic legality as to the day to day backing and so also intrinsic support of lands known as the Rhodesia's. For according to the program, the two Rhodesia's of North and South, were effectively established and so sustained by their British founder or Cecil John Rhodes through mechanisms of a legal registered entity of The British South African Company. In effect, lands were actually privately formed and so constituted and or sustained through due independent recorded means and or resources. They were therefore founded as implied through legal intrinsic financial support and by means secured through sources assembled and structured by private and institutional means. In effect, directly contradicting and further implying: No actual or formal legislated British Government and or Authority had resided as the duly recognized jurisdiction pertaining to and or subsequently in the securing of rightful ownership. So then in effect and as recorded or aired, contradicting certain official British material versions of events. To leave whole questions unanswered of having attained actual legal title and or recourse when viewed through rules pertaining to international laws pertaining.

Successive British Government’s according to certain, but importantly one sided versions: had and so did not duly extend their own official sanction/jurisdiction over defined geographic lands recorded internationally as the 'Rhodesia's as located within the Continent of Africa. These life and death issues, were further endorsed and expanded on during yet another British Broadcasting Corporation program (BBC) titled ‘Rebellion.' Here, it was more openly stated that: The Rhodesian Government was/had been in default on the declaration of that termed 'Unilateral Declaration of Independence' (UDI). Yet the action was duly prevoked in many a view as last ditch attempts, even desperate measures to deliver sanity and so stability to lands and for decades to come. We had our arm heavily twisted while being badly let down time and time again. The actual goal posts, were continually moved or further away at each turn through actual definitions from Rhodesian's. At each turn, this or that was included or moved to then effect the declaration of Independence on the 11th November 1965.

In effect, successive British Authority insisted on virtually having its cake and eating it, also . The laws as to actual legal jurisdiction, had not been as that enshrined through normal practices, statutes or conventions as entrenched throughout a wider British Empire. A mechanism to day to day effective functioning, were simply left to interpretation or suiting emerging world orders. However, in international law there remains that termed by implication as witnessed to actual and effectively functioning. This can in turn well retain and so also sustain and imply far more meaningful, if not deeper implications.

On being drawn down further to actual day to day accountability/legalities, as the due representation of responsibilities. Then clearly demonstrates by implication alone and as further underlined by its own admissions and denunciations: British Authority had clearly and more evidently, indicated it did/had not retained actual day to day legality to impose its own will or say or even positioned to deliver day to day running through material maintenance/assistance in more logical terms. The defined geographic entities recognised internationally and as duly functioning and or referred to and so termed 'The Rhodesia's on one hand, had on one hand a claim to it by British Authority. While on the other, but as and when so suiting, to then totally override/contradict effective claims after certain stated positions.

Therefore in turn also negating any said claims through its own positions of not in fact remaining obliged/obligated to provide and across the board: intrinsic and by other means, day to day support and all this then also implies. To by and through such protestations, prove more conclusively: a total commitment was indeed lacking to actual legal claims as representing a sovereign, enshrined entity of Rhodesia. In effect, totally negating due accountability on one hand, while also implying with the other: responsibilities to affect means, was in fact lacking if and when drawn down in law. To then go on and as transpired: a due process of sanctioning whole lands, yet from behind even stated confused legal lines and or terms of reference as directly having legality of doing so. Then to also and so in effect abscond from all implications and responsibilities of stated positions as implied through legal jurisdiction as to on-going day to day responsibilities. When drawn down as to all responsibilities thereafter in effect: simply did/does not add up through contradiction an accepted British position of either full, part or of no legality. A somewhat and rather confused stand point to deliver further derision as noted contradictions, even stand offs when and so suiting.

THINK YOU ARE CONFUSED BY IT ALL! WELL JUST IMAGINE WHAT A WIDER WORLD SHOULD STILL BE THINKING. WELL, READ ON AS A FURTHER, REAL INJUSTICE STILL FOLLOWS - LET ALONE WHAT HAS FOLLOWED SINCE FOR ZIMBABWEAN'S. WHILE NOT FORGETTING ALL THOSE OF THE THEN FAR MORE SETTLED - PROSPEROUS 'RHODESIA'S.'

OUSTANDING PENSION PAYMENTS: Highly important issue her, as forms part of a total contradiction in terms, as clearly outlined through implying a legality on one hand, while negating agreements with the other. If then claiming legal jurisdiction and all this implies; the paying and or settling of outstanding and in full, at going exchange rates of a period remains outstanding: Contracted Civil Service Pensions and due Southern Rhodesian's as the contracted and so legally in the employ of His/Her Majesty's Government. Britain on one hand, clearly distanced itself from title when termed official occupation and jurisdiction from the late 1800's - onwards. Yet, to then also lay claim of retaining due recourse as rights through international laws to that which its own authority had/has conceded in effect:

It retained no official designated obligation to en-act/implement and so recognised as legal tender Southern Rhodesian pensions due as that signed and sealed by contractual means. Then to further outline and so proclaim: To actually in law, retain official jurisdiction over The Rhodesia's as the official British Colony as sealed by agreements as to its own rights and due terms of reference.

CONFUSED? JOIN THE CLUB - BUT READ ON

British Authority in effect by and or through certain pronouncements of its own spokes-persons and at various periods, actually conceded points of default when viewed on this basis alone. This fact, then further compounded by insisting and so claiming official jurisdiction on one hand: But then also not paying out on legal binding claims as to outstanding pensions while honoring in full, contractual binding agreements/arrangements/obligations to signed and sealed contracts (with documentary evidence still available). Either way, the point as and when viewed through law, reflects a clear outstanding default having transpired one way or other to remain in question. Either that or by conceding actual jurisdiction and responsibility, to then effect and so honor said recorded contractual agreements. Or of never having attained/retained or secured legal tender over rights to institute draconian measures designed to bring a legal regime know as Independent Rhodesia, to its knees. This then throws up additional questions concerning subsequent actions to play as defined or outlined equations.

On one hand, claiming rights through legal jurisdiction as the administrators. This in turn means or implies one way or the other. All issues have not been satisfactorily closed. Indeed, based on this fact alone, should in law: DELIVER on outstanding and said obligations in law, those pension payments as outstanding tender and so due in law Southern Rhodesian's having laid claim to in effect remaining: the legal, official binding bearers of contracts of service duly recognised by international obligations and conventions of Human Rights, to include total periods as that outlined. Allow at least some open discussion on issues, to then let them flow more freely: as to whether or not having retained jurisdiction and so also obligation.

Therefore and so proving more conclusively: employment contracts were/are at the very least still binding. Or that it did not hold effective title over lands at that clearly stated/voiced on occasions, in order to escape outstanding obligations as still accruing. If still pursuing such lines of argument: then a number of other legal issues might well also come into focus. They'd remained perfectly content to duly en-act laws of legal jurisdiction on one hand, yet in general recognized internationally accepted practices and articles recognised as norms and terms: merely cover a position from legal and outstanding obligations, while without also offering Rhodesian's international redress. Merely and when so suiting, virtually having wiped hands of obligations or turned backs on individuals and families or those officially employed by His/Her Majesty's Government under legal, binding civil service contracts. Simply, even as calculated measures, merely walked away from kith and kin, who have been further compromised and so forced in a number of instances: to live hand to mouth, since. In effect, have totally reneged on official outstanding obligations as duly recorded obligations, either way. Even worse was to follow having on one hand portrayed itself the legally retained entity: to then sanction the lands and peoples of Rhodesia.

If on one hand and by claiming no effective mandate existed over the lands of Rhodesia: to address that which has transpired since across the board. The dual aspects as effects over events, should be further highlighted by individuals and families now so afflicted as to effectively leave them distraught through continuing intransigence. They, the now disposed, should be assisted to recruiting means to address an obvious and so also blatant outstanding injustice. A huge obligation still remains to overall rights as outstanding obligations and indeed solutions. At the very least, forms of contradictions still exist, so leaving legalities of some form unresolved. To then also hopefully and by far more honorable means: clearly outline and so reflect which case is/has been placed on the table.

That either there is no obligation to honoring pensions payments due by not retaining legal status as entities and that Rhodesia was in fact recognised an independent and so also legal entity in its own right as duly recorded.

Which side of a coin/was or is still effectively being presented or which card played?

A point I went on to query with the Broadcasting Standards Commission of Britain. To those un-elected individuals, yet who carry and so also carry much weight as to influence events. Those appearing as if offering forms of justice as purported to represent a mere subjects points of view. I'd set out to quantify or rather qualify a total accuracy of the BBC's accounts of events involving both programs 'Rhodes' and so called 'Rebellion.' The British on one hand, totally negated all accountability, even responsibility by openly stating in the programs to holding no jurisdiction and or outstanding obligations.

Yet, when it came to Rhodesian's fairly and more openly formulating their own independent pathways and based or calculated on actual day to day jurisdiction as defined, legal possession and due process, was just not on or allowed.

We as a whole, found ourselves even more isolated on an international basis. To then be followed by what in itself was construed as heavy, illegal penalties employed in the form of world-wide sanctions. These were initially invented and so also vented by our own kith and kin. There to be followed in turn by a world body known as The United Nations, being encouraged to employ similar harsh, if not also inhumane measures. These in turn and after British endeavors, delivered much intolerable suffering and hardship in the main.

The Collins English Dictionary, clearly outlines 'Rebellion' as meaning: An organized opposition to a Government or other legal authority and rejection of an accepted moral code or convention of behavior. 

Rhodesian authority, according to British interpretation as that recorded through both programs. Actually retained day to day official sanction and so jurisdiction over lands to administer measures of due and accountable day to day Governance. Further, as entrenched through definition and or articles of practices: as the duly appointed and so recognised day to day and so responsible administrators. Events therefore and based on that recorded: could not be termed or construed as a ‘Rebellion.’ Indeed, Rhodesian's actually signed up to and so approved in the years of 1961 and 1964: agreements to eventual orderly transfers of power to a majority through one man one vote elections. All we had asked for in return, was it be orderly transfers through calculated time scales in order to effect and deliver minimal safeguards as with those pensions, and to in effect:

Secure a total populous and lands well to futures by offering minimal standards and practices.

However, these very same and said agreements, were then left to one side and as if never having existed and importantly, not by Rhodesian's. Rhodesia was already independent in all but name, as clearly outlined, defined and accepted by successive British Government/Authorities, and so in turn The Crown. Therefore, Rhodesian's had stuck to the letter and rule as that so defined. They and through rules of due engagement, remained on side and at the very least . British Authority, even to this day, denies any official and or outstanding obligations actually exist. Yet, a clear cut case to actual and or official jurisdiction, needs to be confirmed or further clarified to effect and so reinforce actual legalities and so also a clear cut case.

We need to clarify and at any point:

That subsequent British authority retained contractual obligations through agreements or arrangement and in perpetuity.

If still not paying out due pensions as those signed and sealed:

Are they in effect also stating on one hand having had no jurisdiction whatever over lands of The Rhodesia's?

If claiming having been even part responsible, even through verbal arrangement, then pensions remain due and accountable!

WELL - WHICH IS IT TO BE?

Rhodesian's in effect, endeavored maintaining moral code's of conduct, while also entrenching conventions of civil behavior, law and order. Therefore, remains highly questionable whether actions and at any point, can be described, outlined and or defined A REBELLION. We had and at the very least, been in possession as the 'De Facto Government.' In effect, we were actually DEFENDING legally defined entities through possession and or operatives as assigned.

Interpretations of the law, clearly indicate we were legally in possession through minimal 'De facto' of real day to day effective entities.

A fully fledged, functioning, recognized and so constituted independent entity and mechanism titled as such through international law as 'THE RHODESIA'S. So then, automatically negates any reference to a Rebellion having ever transpired in international law. In effect, when further broken down and so dissected: the British themselves and followed in turn by a world body; could well have defaulted and remain so. By having claimed forms of jurisdiction on one hand, also implies something or other really existed as obligations. Then effectively and as clearly stated: Britain claimed it retained all rights in law to effect outcomes.

Well and at the very least, here is the concession as extended or given through actions.

If still not satisfied a case exists, then is recommended the two programs again be aired. If then claiming not to have archive material more readily available, many Rhodesian's have precise details readily accessible.

The British Government/Authorities, remain obligated as defined by rules of laws pertaining through recorded engagement: to duly compensate and at the very least: full outstanding and as backed dated, legally binding Civil Service Pensions to Rhodesian's engaged in the employ of The British Government/Authority/Crown. Payments as outstanding, then calculated at exchange rates pertaining at the period! We tend to recall a exchange rate of some two Rhodesian dollars, representing one British pound!

Questions, more questions, even more outstanding questions. At the very least, certain obligations have been left unanswered to this very day. Did Britain as defined and so enshrined by international laws, conventions and or norms: ever legally acquire rights or legal tender/claims to the day to day jurisdictions on one hand over The Rhodesia's. While also then deciding to simply ignore or override fuller impacts to total responsibilities on the other? Did it ever gain or secure and or accede to official and legal binding jurisdiction over The Rhodesia's?

Well and based on certain of its own official protestations and or renunciations: appears highly likely a case one way or other is proven, but not as yet duly settled.

Therefore, if allowed to broach subjects at a more legal and official level, draconian and other counter productive actions and or measures as duly employed against the lands and peoples of Rhodesia:

Might well remain questionable when viewed and interpreted through international laws.

Rhodes, along with those following and by invitation, but more specifically those born to the lands of the Rhodesia's:

Remain legally entitled and enshrined jurisdictions, as clearly defined by rules ‘Governing Legal Engagement and Possession through binding tender and lawful interpretations.

Indeed, Rhodesian's retain legal rights to lands, as bequeathed any offspring born and so raised to other lands . As the legal, binding entities and so titled genuine on-going heirs apparent. If the International Courts of Human Rights were not so encumbered to certain influences, then Rhodesian's retain and should be allowed passage to a clear a case one way or other. Retain due rights in law of recourse or redress as bottom line justice in those defined as Democratic, free lands. Events which have subsequently afflicted whole lands and peoples in that ultimately termed 'Independent lands of Zimbabwe,' retain certain causes and affects. Poverty as that now clearly recorded as thriving, with whole lands decimated through mismanagement. Which designed effects, have so blighted millions, upon millions of innocent lives and even whole regions.

This then is before due or clear allowance is considered for sanctions having been employed and as supported by forces clearly designed to overthrow a De-Facto, yet legitimate Government. While then also having been implemented and wrongly against a so termed illegal, rebellious regime.'  

We retain original accession to this very day, and therefore remain legal heirs apparent to our lands of birth! All need to learn and so know whether in fact Britain had ever retained even minimal day to day jurisdiction over Rhodesia.

If it did, then to address the fuller implications, more specifically to outstanding pension payments.

If not, then of having placed forward proposals and efforts of having rights to sanction Rhodesia.

Only an authority having claimed more openly rights of redress as possibly the legal entity, can ever justify whether legal measures or not, along with addressing fuller implications did exist . In that case, outstanding obligations as to settle pension payments in full, is as said, but not yet done, even as implied through association alone.

If not proving actual, be it part of full jurisdiction:

Then those actually born to the lands of The Rhodesia's as an indigenous populous, still retain legal title to this very day. Then should also be awarded title through international law to present the facts as minimal rights of recourse. Indeed, a reasonable case simply cannot be argued on our behalf, let alone presented by aggrieved parties as clearly are not permitted and yet again through one sided arguments, alone.

NATURALLY, THE BIGGER YET ALSO RELEVENT ISSUE IS NEVER GOING TO BE ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, AT THE VERY LEAST, LEGAL BINDING PENSION AGREEMENTS AND SO DUE PAYMENTS, SHOULD BE DULY HONORED. IF AS PROCLAIMED, THE BRITISH RETAINED JURISDICTION, THEN ALL WHO LIVE IN CIVILISED WORLDS WITH UNDERLINING VALUES - NEED TO ALSO PROMOTE AND SECURE BASIC JUSTICE!

All vital questions remaining unanswered most conveniently, while a number suffer in silence. History clearly demonstrates a 'Brutal Betrayal' lingers on to this very day and is therefore still outstanding. Yes, deserves and so decrees due recognition, along with final rectification of severe factors to be addressed and recognised by a wider world. It should not be us legitimate Rhodesian's in the dock as if already guilty, as we actually remain innocent. The wrong party in effect was jailed, yet also as innocent bystanders.  Indeed, virtually imprisoned ever since by those having taken literally the living life out of others. Yet, in advertised civilised worlds, a far more balanced representation should still be delivered, if lands advertised as free, fair, democratic lands, are real.

A re-run of the program titled ‘Rebellion’ should be shown, but importantly delivering versions of real outstanding injustices and rather to be re-titled ‘Principles of Rebellion.’ Deliver far more unbiased and balanced versions, which hopefully also delivers far more accurate opinions to represent equations of all the facts. That's before allowance is made of written and sealed agreements entered into with successive British Governments. A world at large of course, should fully realize due justice has not been delivered, even entertained!

WILL IT EVER DELIVER JUSTICE?

No of course not, as is simply not standard norms of parity. Justice is simply now a bye word of convenience and always leans towards a total bias and hypocrisy. Therefore, a wider world simply has no right advertising itself as described or of being genuinely democratic, even transparent entities.

In effect, Cecil John Rhodes secured principles of expanding a business through unsecured loan arrangements. Lenders and or institutions helped secure The Rhodesia's through Cecil John Rhodes. They had and did not retain rights of immediate foreclose on loans as and when so choosing.

Most certainly had/did not assign all loans and obligations to the British Government. Most certainly did not hand over day to day operatives to any other Government, other than that of Rhodesia.

IS THIS THEN STILL A GREAT BETRAYAL IN THE FIRST AND FINAL INSTANCE AGAINST THOSE FORCED TO LIVE WITH OUTCOMES, SINCE!

Britain, might well have operated highly questionable rights over lands, more specifically in relation to Southern Rhodesia. It should not have and according to a number of protestations, even discussed, let alone interfered in the lands.  Yet and to this very day or many decades on, still does not pay up on hard earned basic rights to thousands of former colonial pensioners. It continually claimed legal jurisdiction, but not when clearly and legally bound to recompense individuals.

Then and if the legal entity on one hand: did sanction all Rhodesians?

By then having not satisfied pensions payments, clearly also implies subsequent events and outcomes, might well form bigger issues or pictures. They should at least settle legal, outstanding claims based on obligations linked directly as binding service contracts and needs urgent addressing. Surely any right minded, fair balanced thinking person, has to concede:

A moral right and duty one way or other as enshrined and or advertised as minimal obligations through values, remains due as justice to service outstanding obligations. Along with certain questions at least being asked more openly, with answers more openly being received!

One would think so, but do recall the prized ‘Civil Service,’ has proven virtual laws unto their own down the years. Yes, always recall is an entrenched and so inherited authority of dogma where two sides of the same coin is extended to suit given situations. Heads I win, tails you lose! A set of rules applies, yet once on the the field of play, merely is amended to suit given periods and circumstances. The more common and recognised off-side rule initially applies, but then ends up applying to only the other side. We were most certainly gazumped, while the very foundations to our legal lands and rights and indeed lives, were ruthlessly withdrawn.

Rhodesia and all of it, still belongs to its rightful off-spring, both black and white.

THE LIKES OF MYSELF AS SHOWN THROUGH SPECIFIC AUTOMATIC READINGS HAVE INCARNATED A FEW TIMES TO THESE SPECIFIC LANDS DURING VARYING LIGHT-PERIODS - SO NATURALLY RETAINs MUCH MEANING AND CONNECTION. MORE SPECIFICALLY IN RELATION TO PAST AND PRESENT INJUSTICES/

WHILE MANY ASK WHY AFTER A VIRTUAL LIFETIME, I STILL BOTHER WITH ALL THIS - AS IS HISTORY - DONE AND DUSTED? WHAT IS ANY FUTURE WORTH IF NOT BORN FROM PASTS - WHO ARE OUR PARENTS AND THEIR PARENTS IF NOT A PAST AND FUTURE? WHAT IS YOUR LIFE IF NOT ALSO DIRECTLY LINKED TO A HISTORY? WHAT THE HELL, SO LONG AS ONES OWN BACK GARDENS APPEAR GREEN AND FLOURISHING!! WELL, THERE ARE THOSE WITH TRUE HEARTS REMAINING, WHO NOT ONLY FEEL THEIR OWN DEEP LOSS AT HAVING A WHOLE COUNTRY AND ALL THIS IMPLIES STOLEN. THEY ALSO HAPPEN TO FEEL DEEP ANGUISH FOR THOSE LEFT BEHIND TO BECOME A MANIPULATED, DOWN-TRODDEN MAJORITY.

THERE ABANDONED BY A CIVILISED WORLD TO SUFFER TOTAL DEPRIVATION IN LANDS WHERE ONCE ONLY PROSPERITY REIGNED. LANDS WHICH ONCE OFFERED LAW AND ORDER, ALONG WITH GROWTH TO FLOURISH AS 'THE BREAD BASKET OF AFRICA.' NOW JUST FOR A MOMENT, PLEASE IMAGINE IF YOU WILL, HAVING ALSO ENDED UP IN THIS VERY SAME POSITION OR HAVING YOUR OWN LANDS STOLEN FROM YOU, FAMILY BRUTALLY MURDERED BY THUGS, YET WITHOUT ANY DUE RECOURSE THEN AND AS OF NOW!

I'VE ALWAYS SUPPORTED HIGHLIGHTING WHAT HAPPENED TO THE JEWS AT THE VICIOUS HANDS OF ADOLF HITLER, HIS BUTCHERS AND HENCHMEN. THE WORLD HAS NEVER AND RIGHTLY, BEEN ALLOWED TO FORGET THOSE GRUESOME EVENTS. YET, WE RHODESIAN'S - WELL WHAT THE HECK - WHO CARES? THEY CAN GO TO HELL!!

THE ABOVE COMPARISONS OF WHAT HAPPENED TO US AND A MAJORITY OF ZIMBABWEAN'S SINCE, ARE VERY SIMILAR ON REFLECTION, BELIEVE ME.

YET, NO ACTION HAD BEEN TAKEN TO SAVE A LAND AND PEOPLE FROM BEING TOTALLY DEVASTATED, WHICH INACTION MUST HAVE ALL WONDERING - WHY!

WAS AND IS THERE STIIL A FAR BIGGER AGENDA AT PLAY - WHICH ENTAILS INTERNATIONAL DIMENSIONS ALL THE WHILE?

AN ADVERTISED CIVILISED WORLD, SIMPLY STOOD IDLY BY. THIS WHILE MANY HAVE BEEN BRUISED, TORTURED, BADLY DAMAGED, DIED AT THE BRUTAL AND TAINTED HANDS OF REGIMES REPRESENTING EVEN A MODERN DAY THIRD REICH AS WHOLE LANDS AND LIVES ARE BLIGHTED FOR LIFE!

THE PEOPLE OF ZIMBABWE ARE HUMAN, ALSO AFTERALL IN A WORLD ADVERTISED AS CIVILISED!

THE LANDS OF RHODESIA, ARE AND HAVE BEEN RECORDED BY GREATER CELESTIAL CREATION (CIC) AS CLEAR CUT EXAMPLES OF POLICIES, MEASURES AND SYSTEMS EMPLOYED TO BLIGHT WHOLE LANDS. THEN AS IF A CONTAGEOUS VIRUS SPREADS FAR AND WIDE TO ENGULF WHOLE CONTINENTS AND FINALLY A WIDER PLANETS AFFLICTED. DESIRED OUTCOMES AND REASONS AS TO WHY HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO UNFOLD, ARE DEEPLY ENCODED TO EARTH'S DIVINE TEMPLATE. AREAS AS THIS OR WHERE INJUSTICE REMAINS OUSTANDING WITH RHODESIA - AS CLEAR CUT EXAMPLES FOR ALL TO FINALLY HEED.

THY WILL BE DONE ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN

************************

SOME QUOTES OF MANY TO MAKE ONE THINK!

 "Your vision will become clear only when you can look into your own heart.   Who looks outside, dreams.  Who looks inside, awakens." ...Carl Jung

************************

Faith can move mountains. Faith is free cannot be purchased or manufactured. Since faith is free, the value of faith is based on how deeply a person believes. In addition, the fact that faith is free makes faith available to everyone. Faith is a commitment that does not come from a price tag or prestigious award, but rather from a free will decision. Yes, faith can move mountains, if a person's faith is deep. Faith can also move people; it can move people in a very special way that creates a sense of unity and harmony. Free will has unlimited capacity through ‘THE POWER OF FAITH.’ 

************************

They say remaining genuine is an art and which should be taught so can be etched to all conscious minds!

Robert Winston-Burnett and received through automatic writing of the divine light on the 24th January 2005.

************************

A land will not be allowed to flourish so long as strife as a weakness remains the strength of others
by Robert Winston-Burnett as recorded in these accounts.

 ************************

If, as Winston Churchill believed, "We shape our dwelling, and afterwards, our dwellings shape us."

************************

Then as Earth remains our main residence, we have ensured it also delivers "TRUTHS" as to cause and effect.

Robert Winston-Burnett

************************

TRUE LASTING FREEDOMS ARE NOT AS MANUFACTURED BY MAN ALONE, BUT AS THAT ORDAINED THROUGH CONFORMITY TO UNIVERSAL LAWS - PERIOD.

Received by Robert Winston-Burnett through automatic writing of divine-light on the 24th January 2005.